Bond Appeals and the Automatic Stay the Government Can Invoke
A release order is not the same as release. Where the government had refused release or set a high bond, a single filing made within one business day keeps the person in custody while the appeal is decided, and the clock on that freeze can be extended by the detained person's own request.
The rule in short
Either party may appeal a custody decision to the Board of Immigration Appeals. Where the government had ordered no release or set a bond of ten thousand dollars or more, filing a notice of intent to appeal within one business day automatically stays the judge's release order. The stay lapses if a notice of appeal is not filed within ten business days, and lapses again ninety days after that filing if the Board has not decided the appeal.
An order granting release ends the hearing but does not always end the detention. In a defined set of cases the government can freeze the order with a single filing made before the end of the next business day, and the person stays where they are while the Board of Immigration Appeals works through the appeal. Understanding when that can happen changes how a custody hearing is prepared.
Who can appeal and how
A custody determination by an immigration judge may be appealed to the Board of Immigration Appeals. Either party may take the appeal, and the mechanics are the ordinary ones: a notice of appeal filed directly with the Board, accompanied by the fee or by a fee waiver request.
The general deadline is ten calendar days from the judge's decision. It is calculated from the stating of an oral decision or the mailing or electronic notification of a written one, and where the last day falls on a weekend or legal holiday it moves to the next business day. If the fee is not paid or a waiver request not filed inside that window, the appeal is not properly filed and the judge's decision becomes final as though no appeal had been taken.
One further trap sits in the same regulation: any issue not raised in the notice of appeal is deemed waived. A notice that says only that the decision was wrong preserves very little.
When the automatic stay is available
The automatic stay is not available in every case. It applies where the government had determined that the person should not be released, or had set a bond of ten thousand dollars or more. Those two conditions are the gateway.
Where the gateway is open, any order of the immigration judge authorizing release, on bond or otherwise, is stayed on the government's filing of a notice of intent to appeal with the immigration court within one business day of the order. The stay then holds the release order in abeyance pending the Board's decision on the appeal. Whether to file that notice is a matter of discretion for the government.
Where the gateway is closed, the government must instead ask the Board for a discretionary stay, which it may do at any time in connection with an appeal, including on an emergency basis. A discretionary stay is granted or refused on the Board's judgment rather than automatically.
| Step | Time limit | What happens if it is missed |
|---|---|---|
| Notice of intent to appeal filed with the court | One business day of the order | No automatic stay; release proceeds unless a discretionary stay is granted |
| Notice of appeal filed with the Board | Ten business days of the order | The stay lapses |
| Judge's written custody decision prepared | Five business days after notice of the appeal | Extendable by five more business days with the Board's approval |
| Board decides the custody appeal | Ninety days from the notice of appeal | The automatic stay lapses |
| Release after a favorable Board decision | Stayed five business days | Continues to be stayed if the case is referred to the Attorney General |
What the government must show to hold it
The automatic stay is not free of conditions. To preserve it, the government must file its notice of appeal within ten business days and must accompany it with a certification by a senior legal official. That official has to certify both that the filing was approved under the government's own review procedures and that the contentions justifying continued detention have evidentiary support, with legal arguments warranted by existing law or by a non-frivolous argument for extending, modifying or reversing it.
The judge, in turn, must prepare a written decision explaining the custody determination within five business days of being told the appeal was filed, extendable by five more business days with the Board's approval in exigent circumstances, and the court must send the record without delay.
The automatic stay lapses ninety days after the notice of appeal if the Board has not acted. But if the Board grants a motion by the detained person to enlarge the briefing schedule, its order also tolls the ninety-day period by the same number of days. Asking for more time to brief a custody appeal therefore extends the detention it is meant to end. The choice between a fuller brief and a faster clock has to be made deliberately.
When the stay runs out
If the Board has not decided the appeal within ninety days of the notice of appeal, the automatic stay lapses. The government can prepare for that by filing a motion for a discretionary stay at any time after its notice of appeal and at a reasonable time before the automatic stay expires, incorporating the arguments already made in its brief.
If the Board authorizes release, denies the discretionary stay motion, or fails to act on it before the automatic stay expires, release is automatically stayed for a further five business days. Within that window the case may be referred to the Attorney General, in which event release continues to be stayed pending that consideration, with the stay expiring fifteen business days after the referral.
The sequence is worth mapping out at the start, because it determines whether a favorable custody ruling produces release in days or in months. A relative preparing to post money should understand that the undertaking is a separate obligation to the government rather than a payment to the court, and questions about what it covers belong with a bond appeal attorney rather than with the judge deciding the appeal.
How this changes hearing strategy
Two practical consequences follow. The first is that where the government has set no bond or a bond of ten thousand dollars or more, a release order should be treated as provisional. Family members should be told that the person may not walk out, so that the disappointment of a stayed order is not compounded by surprise.
The second is that the written record matters more than usual. The judge's written custody decision, prepared quickly under pressure, is what the Board reads. Exhibits that were merely described orally may not carry through. Filing a written bond packet with tabbed exhibits, rather than handing documents up at the hearing, gives the decision something to rest on, and the preparation involved is described in bond amounts, flight risk and danger findings.
Where the automatic stay is unavailable because the person was never in a no-release posture, the appeal proceeds without freezing anything, and the ordinary procedure applies as described in asking a judge to reconsider immigration custody. Where the person was never eligible for a custody hearing at all, none of this arises, a situation covered in detention that no bond hearing can reach.
Points to carry away
- A custody appeal is taken to the Board of Immigration Appeals on the standard notice of appeal form.
- The automatic stay is available only where the government refused release or set a bond of at least ten thousand dollars.
- The stay attaches on the filing of a notice of intent to appeal within one business day of the judge's order.
- The stay lapses if a notice of appeal is not filed within ten business days of the order.
- The stay lapses ninety days after the notice of appeal if the Board has not decided the case.
Questions readers ask
Does the person have to stay in custody during their own appeal of a denial?
Yes. Where the judge denies release and the person appeals, nothing about the appeal changes custody in the meantime. The denial stands while the Board considers it, and there is no equivalent to the automatic stay running in the person's favor. Because Board decisions on custody appeals are not instant, the practical calculation is whether the appeal is likely to succeed sooner than the removal case will be decided, since a decided case ends the custody question altogether.
Can new evidence be submitted with a custody appeal?
The Board reviews the record made before the immigration judge and is not the place to introduce material that was available and simply not filed. Where genuinely new facts have arisen, the better route is usually a fresh request to the immigration judge, which is permitted on a written showing that circumstances have changed materially since the earlier decision. That route also produces a decision faster than an appeal in most cases, which matters when the person is detained.
What is the effect on the person who posted the money if a bond is later revoked?
The obligation runs between the government and the person who posted the bond, not between that person and the court. It is a contractual undertaking to produce the released person when demanded, and it survives the removal case. Whether the money is returned turns on compliance with that undertaking rather than on the outcome of the immigration case, which is why the obligor's position needs to be understood before any money changes hands.
Sources
- 8 C.F.R. § 1003.19 — Custody/bondSubsection (i) creates the discretionary stay authority and the automatic stay on a one-business-day filing.
- 8 C.F.R. § 1003.6 — Stay of execution of decisionSets the ten-business-day, five-business-day and ninety-day steps that govern an automatic stay.
- 8 C.F.R. § 1003.38 — AppealsGoverns the notice of appeal, its deadline, the fee requirement and waiver of unraised issues.
- 8 C.F.R. § 1003.3 — Notice of appealSets the contents of the notice and the briefing schedule that can toll the stay period.
- 8 U.S.C. § 1226 — Apprehension and detention of aliensThe statutory authority for the custody decision that is being appealed.
- EOIR, Types of Appeals, Motions, and Required FeesThe agency's own listing of appeal types and the fees that attach to each.
Metro Law Advisors is a publication, not a law firm. This article states general rules and cites its sources; it is not advice about any particular case, and the law differs by state and changes over time.
More in Removal Defense
Calling an Expert Witness in Immigration Court
There is no formal admissibility test for expert testimony in immigration court, so the judge decides qualification and weight in the same breath. The written report filed before the hearing does most of the work: it establishes qualifications, states the materials reviewed, sets out the methodology and connects the opinion to the individual applicant. Filing deadlines are enforced, and an expert not listed by the deadline may not be heard.
Proving Hardship to a Qualifying Relative
Cancellation of removal for a non-permanent resident requires exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to a citizen or permanent resident spouse, parent or child. The list of qualifying relatives is closed, hardship to the applicant does not count, and the standard demands hardship substantially beyond what ordinarily follows from removal. The record must address both the relative staying behind and the relative leaving, because the judge considers each possibility.
Reopening for Ineffective Assistance and the Notice It Requires
A motion to reopen based on ineffective assistance is expected to include a detailed affidavit setting out what was agreed with the former representative and what was represented, evidence that the former representative was informed of the allegations and given an opportunity to respond, and a statement whether a disciplinary complaint has been filed and if not why not. Prejudice must also be shown, and the ordinary ninety-day limit still applies.