Skip to content
Metro Law

    Areas of practice

    This library

    Product Safety & Recalls

    What a Corrective Action Plan Commits a Company To

    The announcement is the visible part. The plan behind it commits a firm to a defined remedy, a notification program, periodic progress reporting and the control of every remaining unit, and it stays open until the Commission agrees it can close.

    Product Safety & Recalls6 min readFederal lawCorrective action plans

    A meeting table with printed spreadsheets, a laptop and coffee cups, seen from above with two people leaning over the papers
    Most of the plan is a schedule of obligations that outlast the day it is announced. — RICHI Manufacture, CC BY 4.0, source.

    The rule in short

    A voluntary corrective action plan is a negotiated document in which a firm undertakes to notify identified audiences, provide a stated remedy, account for units in the distribution chain, and report progress on a fixed cycle. It carries no admission requirement but is enforceable in practice, because selling a product subject to a publicly announced voluntary corrective action is a prohibited act. The plan closes only when the Commission accepts that the undertakings are complete.

    The public part of a recall is a paragraph and a photograph. The document behind it is a set of undertakings with dates attached, and those undertakings are what a firm is actually agreeing to when it signs. Read as a commercial commitment rather than as a regulatory formality, a corrective action plan is one of the more demanding documents a consumer products business will sign.

    The shape of the document

    A corrective action plan is a written statement, agreed with staff, describing the action a firm will take with respect to a product that presents a substantial product hazard or an unreasonable risk. It typically opens with the firm's position, which frequently states that the firm does not admit a defect or a hazard, and then sets out the actions the firm will take regardless.

    The regulation contemplates that a plan may include an admission or an express denial, and that it may state that the Commission's staff has not made a determination. Those recitals affect the litigation posture of the plan; they do not affect the obligations inside it.

    Plans commonly contain an acknowledgment that the Commission may publicize the action, an undertaking to comply with the reporting requirements, and provision for the plan to be superseded if a different remedy becomes necessary.

    The remedy and its conditions

    The remedy is drawn from the same set the statute provides for a compulsory order: bringing the product into conformity or repairing the defect, replacing it with a like or equivalent product that complies and does not contain the defect, or refunding the purchase price.

    Each option carries conditions the plan will spell out. A repair commits the firm to a defined procedure, to the parts or kits it requires, to who performs it, and to what happens if the repair proves ineffective. A replacement raises the question of what counts as equivalent, particularly where the original product has been discontinued. A refund raises the deduction question: the statute permits a reasonable allowance for use where the product has been in a consumer's possession for a year or more, measured from public notice or actual notice, whichever comes first.

    The plan also fixes who bears the cost of return shipping, whether proof of purchase is required, and how long the remedy remains open. Each of those choices affects the response rate, which is the number the Commission will look at later.

    UndertakingWhat it obliges the firm to doWhen it ends
    Notification programReach identified consumers, distributors and retailers by agreed channels and messageWhen the agreed channels have been exhausted and results reported
    Remedy provisionDeliver the repair, replacement or refund on the stated termsAt the stated closing date, if the Commission accepts closure
    Stock controlIdentify, quarantine and dispose of units in the chain and in the firm's own inventoryWhen the disposition of all identified units is documented
    Progress reportingReport units corrected, units returned and response rate on a fixed cycleWhen the plan is closed by agreement
    Records retentionKeep the underlying data supporting each reportContinues after closure for the period the plan specifies

    The notification program

    The notice element is usually the most negotiated part of the plan, because it determines both the cost and the reach. The statute allows the Commission to require public notice, mail notice to known purchasers, notice to distributors and retailers, and notice by other means, and a plan will specify which combination applies.

    Direct notice is preferred wherever a firm holds names and addresses. Registration cards, warranty databases, online accounts and retailer loyalty data are all sources a plan may require the firm to use, and a firm that holds such data and does not use it will be asked why. Where direct notice is impossible, the plan turns to press release, website posting, point-of-sale signage and notice through the retailers that sold the product.

    The content is prescribed as well as the channel: a description of the product, a description of the hazard, the number of units, the remedy and how to obtain it, and instructions to stop using the product. The detailed mechanics of notice, remedy and measurement sit under running a recall.

    The plan makes continued sale a prohibited act

    Once a voluntary corrective action has been publicly announced in consultation with the Commission, selling, offering for sale or distributing the product in commerce is a prohibited act. That converts a negotiated commitment into a statutory prohibition reaching everyone in the chain, including sellers who never signed anything. A firm that agrees a plan and then allows remaining stock to move has created exposure for its distributors as well as for itself.

    Progress reporting and getting to closure

    Plans require periodic reports, typically monthly at first and less frequently later. The reports set out the number of units subject to the action, the number corrected, the number returned or destroyed, the response rate, and the steps taken since the last report.

    Response rate is the measure that matters most and the one firms find hardest to move. Rates depend heavily on product type, purchase price, how recently the product was sold and whether the firm holds direct contact data. A low rate does not automatically extend the plan, but it will prompt questions about whether the notification program was adequate and whether additional measures are warranted.

    Closure is not automatic and is not achieved by the passage of the plan's stated end date. The firm requests it, supported by the final report, and the Commission accepts or declines. Where units remain unaccounted for, the plan may continue with reduced reporting rather than close.

    What the plan does not resolve

    Agreeing a corrective action plan does not settle the question of penalties. Failure to report on time, or failure to report at all before the matter came to attention, remains a separate exposure assessed under the penalty factors, and the existence of a cooperative plan is one of the factors weighed rather than a bar.

    It does not resolve private litigation. Plaintiffs use the corrective action as evidence of the firm's knowledge and of the hazard, and the disclaimer language in the plan carries limited weight against that use.

    It does not end the firm's obligations on the same product. If new information emerges suggesting the remedy is inadequate or the hazard is broader than understood, the reporting duty runs again on the same terms, and the fact that a plan is already in place does not extend the deadline. Nor does it settle what happens to units that were never recovered, which remain subject to the resale prohibition described under reselling recalled goods. Where agreement on the plan cannot be reached at all, the alternative route is the compulsory one set out under when a recall stops being voluntary.

    Points to carry away

    • The plan specifies the remedy offered, which is ordinarily repair, replacement or refund, and the conditions attached to it.
    • It defines the notification program, including who is told, by what means and with what message.
    • It commits the firm to accounting for units still in the distribution chain and to preventing their further sale.
    • Periodic progress reports are part of the undertaking, and the reporting cycle continues until the plan closes.
    • Selling a product subject to a publicly announced voluntary corrective action is a separately prohibited act.

    Questions readers ask

    Is a corrective action plan an admission that the product is defective?

    No. Plans are routinely agreed on the basis that the firm does not concede the existence of a defect or a substantial product hazard, and the statute provides that a report under the hazard reporting provision is not an admission. What the plan does concede is that the firm will take the actions described. That distinction is legally real but practically limited: the actions themselves are visible, and a plaintiff in a private suit will use the corrective action as evidence of notice even where the plan disclaims a defect finding.

    What happens to product sitting with retailers when a plan is agreed?

    The plan will require it to be identified, quarantined and either returned or destroyed under a documented process. That is one of the harder undertakings to satisfy, because the firm often has no direct relationship with the final seller and no ability to compel action. Plans therefore commonly include an obligation to contact every known distributor and retailer, to obtain confirmation that stock has been removed, and to report the results. Units that cannot be accounted for remain a live issue at closure.

    Can a plan be amended after it is agreed?

    Yes, and amendments are common, usually because the response rate is lower than expected or because a remedy proves impractical. Where a plan was imposed by order rather than agreed, the Commission has express authority to amend it or require amendment if it finds the plan is not effective or appropriate, or is not being executed effectively. In a negotiated plan the same result is reached by discussion, but the practical position is similar: a plan that is not working will be changed rather than allowed to expire.

    Sources

    1. 16 CFR § 1115.20 — Voluntary remedial actionsDescribes corrective action plans, their elements and the Commission's approach to them.
    2. 16 CFR § 1115.21 — Compulsory remedial actionsThe alternative route where agreement is not reached, and the procedures it follows.
    3. 15 U.S.C. § 2064 — Substantial product hazardsSets the notice, repair, replacement and refund remedies and the action plan requirement.
    4. 15 U.S.C. § 2068 — Prohibited actsMakes it unlawful to sell a product subject to a publicly announced voluntary corrective action.
    5. 15 U.S.C. § 2069 — Civil penaltiesThe penalty exposure attaching to a violation of the prohibited acts provision.
    6. 16 CFR § 1115.13 — Content and form of reportsThe reporting obligations that run alongside and into a corrective action.

    Metro Law Advisors is a publication, not a law firm. This article states general rules and cites its sources; it is not advice about any particular case, and the law differs by state and changes over time.

    More in Product Safety & Recalls

    Product Safety & Recalls

    Tracking Labels on Children's Products

    A manufacturer of a children's product must place permanent distinguishing marks on the product and its packaging, to the extent practicable, that enable the manufacturer to ascertain the location and date of production and cohort information such as a batch or run number, and enable an ultimate purchaser to determine the source, the date of production and detailed information about the manufacturing process. The mark supports recall targeting and consumer identification.

    6 min readFederal law

    Product Safety & Recalls

    When a Recall Stops Being Voluntary

    A voluntary corrective action is a negotiated plan agreed with staff and publicly announced. A mandatory recall requires the Commission to determine, after affording interested persons an opportunity for a hearing, that a product distributed in commerce presents a substantial product hazard and that notification or remedy is in the public interest. The compulsory route offers procedural protections the negotiated route does not, at the cost of time, cost and publicity.

    6 min readFederal law

    Product Safety & Recalls

    Reselling Recalled and Non-Compliant Goods

    It is a prohibited act to sell, offer for sale, distribute in commerce or import a consumer product that is subject to a voluntary corrective action taken in consultation with the Commission and publicly announced, or subject to an order requiring notification or remedy. The same prohibitions apply to banned hazardous products and banned hazardous substances. Liquidation, clearance and secondhand channels are the routes through which recalled stock most often reappears.

    6 min readFederal law